Exposing the Fallacy: The Harmful Effects of False Advertising and the Need for Scientific Rigor in Consumer Protection
To connect with their intended
target customer base, companies use advertisements making false or misleading
statements in their commercials to entice the customers into purchasing their
products and services. This has been done throughout history and is not a new
phenomenon that has occurred.
False advertising has its roots in
the time of 19th century, when companies used unethical marketing practices to
promote their goods and services. A common product known as "snake
oil" an imitation alternative of Asian product that made claims to treat a
number of illnesses, arthritis, and headaches. However, it was discovered that
the imitation snake oil was a fake concoction of various oils, including cow
fat, with no medical qualities.
In the early 20th
century, companies began exploiting scientific claims to market their product to consumers, which increased the prominence and complexity of
marketing. Tobacco companies stated that their cigarettes were safe and secure
to use and were endorsed by medical professionals. Similarly to this case, food
companies advertised their food as healthy and beneficial despite possessing
high levels of sodium, sugars, and other harmful ingredients.
During the middle of 20th century when television initially
became popular, promotional increased immensely, and companies put in immense
efforts to use more aggressive techniques of marketing on their consumer base.
In spite of the lack of scientific evidence that supported their claims, a wellknown antacid manufacturer commented that their product provided rapid stomach
pain relief compared to other competing brands in the 1950s. It triggered a legal action that ended up
resulting a $1 million compensation for the company.
The Federal Trade Commission commonly known as the FTC was
formed in the 1970s to deal with the false advertisements to protect consumers.
Monitoring and enforcing companies that use fraudulent marketing strategies is
the primary duty of the FTC. In 1979 FTC penalized a cereal manufacturer for
using false claims about nutritional benefit offered by their products and how
it might enhance the kids' academic performance.
Despite various efforts from FTC and other regulatory
bodies, false advertising is still a problem in modern era. Recently, several companies
have been exposed for several high-profile cases that made false or misleading
claims of their products and services. The company was charged with a fine of
$34 million by the FTC for deceptive advertising.
By promoting ineffective or other harmful goods, deceptive
advertising harms public health and safety in addition to the finances of
consumers. For instance, a well-known energy drink advertised that its product
would enhance cognitive abilities and lower the risk of heart disease, but
several studies revealed that it actually had the opposite impact, causing
heart palpitations, seizures, and even death.
The FTC and other oversight organizations have stepped up
their efforts to keep an eye on and control advertising practices. For
instance, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has the
authority to fine businesses violating its stringent advertising claims guidelines. The Truth in Advertisement campaign aims to educate
customers and consumers about misleading marketing techniques, is one of many
initiatives the FTC has launched in the US to safeguard consumers from false
advertising.
All throughout history and into the modern age, deceptive
advertising has existed. Regulatory agencies are responsible for monitoring and
upholding advertising standards because false claims can damage consumers,
society, and the public health. Consumers can also protect themselves by being
conscious of false marketing strategies and conducting study before buying
their products. We cannot guarantee that advertisements will fulfil their
intended functions of informing and promoting without endangering and deceiving
their target audiences unless we can distinguish between facts and fiction.
Comments
Post a Comment